I was lucky three times. First, a colleague from my former career, who is now also a reference and instruction librarian, told me in a Facebook message, “Ray, you must go to LOEX!” Thank you Meridith! Second, several of the librarians I work with were planning to carpool to LOEX2016 in Pittsburgh, and I got plugged into their network. Third, they convinced me to apply for conference/travel funding, even though I was/am only part-time. And I got funding! Here is a photo of the AU delegation:
We arrived in time for the Thursday First-Time Attendee Orientation. Brad Sietz, LOEX director, gave a talk that was simultaneously the history of LOEX, the history of library instruction, and the latest in current trends and developments in librarianship. It was a warm and enthusiastic crowd. I tweeted:
— Ray Maxwell (@hsifnihplod) May 5, 2016
Thursday night I joined a group for dinner at the Original Oyster House in Market Square.
Friday opened with breakfast and the keynote address by Dr. Sheila Corrall from Pitt. Lots of material and lots of references but she kept my interest. Her comments on “reflective practices” and “blended librarianship” in library instruction really caught my ear. Will be reviewing her slides as soon as they are posted.
The sessions I attended Friday were all interesting and informative. Lots of tweets, lots of good sources. So cool to finally meet face-to-face with people I’ve only “known” through twitter chats, esp. the #critlib folks. Speaking of #critlib, a colleague mentioned that LOEX is the whitest library conference she’s attended. If true, I don’t think that is the fault of the LOEX conference folks: applications to attend are not racially screened. So are librarians of color self-selecting out by not applying? Perhaps an economic decision gets made to go to ALA or another of the big conferences, and no funding is left? Maybe library instruction is considered less important ( I am still amazed that Information Literacy and Instructional Design was just an elective at my LIS program, and offered only once a year, but glad I took it as an elective). Should it even be interesting that a largely white profession (librarianship) has even whiter sub-professions (library instruction) offering essential skills and competencies for success in the overall profession?
Also, speaking of #critlib, shouldn’t information literacy/library instruction/instructional design occupy a more prominent place in critical librarianship discussions? I would think that the way we teach, and the extent to which our teaching is successful/effective is a very significant part of our identity as information professionals.
OK. Friday night dine around was so much fun. I got on the list for Nicky’s Thai Kitchen with the #critlib folks. Seating was tight but the food was delicious! Here is a pic from a tweet:
— Ray Maxwell (@hsifnihplod) May 7, 2016
Saturday morning we had pancakes for breakfast. And the lightning round of presentations has some fascinating ideas (even though my own didn’t make the cut). Favorite lightning round talk: The Human Library (gotta get one at my institution!). We skipped the afternoon sessions and got an early start on the road back to DC.
Hoping soon to pull together the live tweets (Kelly has a good one here, and there may be interest in building a bibliography of greatest hit sources from the excellent presentations.